Dam(n)! Controversy on the Nile...
Hello again! This blog aims to discuss the role of water storage in aiding water and development in Africa in the age of climate change. Conversations of climate change are inherently political, and thus, so are the decisions regarding adaptation, mitigations, and sustainability. Unfortunately, the vulnerability of communities is also determined by non-climatic factors (Mason et al., 2011). One way to help reduce vulnerability is through increased water storage. Dams are used globally; however, this blog will focus on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD). Investments in such water infrastructure are needed to ensure water security, so the structure of the economy plays an important role, especially with the looming threat of climate change.
![]() |
| Figure 1: A graph showing the relation between Ethiopia's GDP and rainfall (Grey and Sadoff, 2007) |
In Ethiopia, hydrological variability is strongly related to economic growth, as shown in Figure 1. Models show that if there is a singular drought in twelve years, economic growth diminishes by 10% across the whole twelve years (Grey and Sadoff, 2007). This is particularly alarming as droughts typically occur every 3 to 5 years. The GERD was built to increase water security, produce hydroelectric power, and reduce recurrent flooding. It has taken 12 years of construction and nearly £4 billion to create the reservoir the size of Greater London. At full capacity, it will double Ethiopia's electricity production, to which only half the population currently have access. However, it will also dramatically reduce river flow downstream, therefore igniting political tensions.
![]() |
| Figure 2: A map showing the Nile River with its main branches and the site of the GERD (Yihdego et al., 2017). Treaties in both 1929 and 1959 gave Egypt and Sudan rights to almost all the Nile's water and the right to veto any projects that may disrupt the flow of this water. Whilst Sudan hasn't been able to voice its concerns due to its political attention on the current conflict, Egypt's political voice has been very active in its dispute with Ethiopia over the GERD. Ethiopia has publically stated that it shall not be bound by old treaties. This has recently been compounded further by Ethiopia filling the colossal dam in 3 years despite agreements to fill it gradually over a 12-to-21-year period. Lots of water stored in dams is lost due to high surface temperatures increasing evaporation rates, particularly detrimental close to the equator. Therefore, underground dams are also important. They store water in the pores of strata, using a cut-off wall to dam groundwater flow (Ishida et al., 2011). They seem like an ideal solution; however, the cost is much higher, and the construction is more complex. Therefore, more research is needed before they can be coined the 'solution'. 3.1% of annual global deaths are attributed to unsafe drinking water (Flynn et al., 2012). This may be due to both the scarcity and safety of available water sources. Dams increase water availability, whilst underground dams can improve the safety of water available as groundwater is widely accepted to have a lower pathogen content than surface water. Please stay tuned as this blog continues to explore the complexities of environmental change and water in Africa. |


Hi Charlotte! thoroughly enjoyed this post as always! and i really liked the case study you chose to illustrate the contestations that can arise from water and changing environments! How do you think the dam will impact those in Egypt who may have reduced river flow whilst potentially suffering with some of the climate change impacts you mentioned in the blog post?
ReplyDeleteHello Sarah, thank you so much for you comment! Egypt, as a nation, are highly reliant on the water from the nile for agriculture and hence their development. Many communities have flourished along the banks of the Nile, with the water used to irrigate their crops and sustain their livestock. Thus reduced river flow could have huge impacts leading to higher reliance on imported food which is not environmentally sustainable (food miles) but trade can be heavily reliant on political relations. The river's regime was suspected to become less predictable as a result of climate change thus the combination of human factors also could have serious ramifications for Egyptian communities whose livelihoods depend on this water source.
DeleteI love the title of this post- really catches your attention.
ReplyDeleteDo you believe other underground dams will be constructed? Can they still be used in the same way with generating hydropower? Or is the economic costs so great that traditional dams will be used instead despite the water loss from evaporation?
Thank you very much Beth! I think that other underground dams will be constructed however, I don't think they will ever become more popular than regular dams. They do not have the same capacity to produce hydroelectric power as surface dams, their main role is as a water storage facility. I also think that it is not just their huge economic costs that make underground dams less favourable but the complex engineering and comparative lack of research. Therefore, whilst surface dams are subject to water loss from evaporation I struggle to imagine a time when underground dams would be the favourable option.
DeleteHi Charlotte, super interesting blog post - it's such an interesting topic discussing adaptations to water infrastructure as the world's climate continues to change. I guess its a difficult choice trying to pick which infrastructure suits a situation best - depending on region, climate, rainfall variability, economic state etc. As you were researching this, did you come across any other interesting water storage infrastructure ideas you found compelling for the future of water sustainability?
ReplyDeleteHi Elizabeth, thank you for your comment I'm so glad you find this topic as interesting as I do. In my personal opinion, I think that groundwater storage and its accompanying infrastructure, once fully researched, is the most compelling water source for the future of water sustainability. As it stands, I think it is the least damaging to the environment and should be used at a rate that is replenish-able. These ideas I have discussed further in my previous blog post if you get a chance to check it out!
Delete